More about This Topic
Are Divorce Settlement Negotiations Confidential In Illinois?
In the process of an Illinois divorce, the parties will often make settlement offers to resolve some or all of the issues in their divorce.
An offer isn’t a deal until the offer is accepted by both parties to the divorce. So, an offer of settlement in a divorce creates a vulnerability for the offeror: it lets the other party know the terms at which they will resolve the divorce case. With this knowledge in hand, the opposing party can counter-offer or even share the offer with the judge as an example of how unreasonable the offeror was.
Is there any confidentiality rule regarding settlement negotiations in an Illinois divorce?
Parenting Issues And Confidentiality In An Illinois Divorce
For issues regarding children the parties are required to exchange and file proposed settlements within 120 days of the filing of the divorce.
“All parents, within 120 days after service or filing of any petition for allocation of parental responsibilities, must file with the court, either jointly or separately, a proposed parenting plan.” 750 ILCS 5/602.10(a)
If something is filed in an Illinois court it will be public information that the judge, the opposing party and the public-at-large can inspect.
“All records, dockets and books required by law to be kept by such clerks shall be deemed public records, and shall at all times be open to inspection without fee or reward, and all persons shall have free access for inspection and examination to such records, docket and books, and also to all papers on file in different clerks’ offices and shall have the right to take memoranda and abstracts thereof.” 750 ILCS 105/16(6)
So, proposals and settlements regarding children cannot be kept confidential in an Illinois divorce unless the parties are willing to agree not to file proposed parenting plans and merely exchange those plans privately. The court does not inspect to see if every case has a filed parenting plan and will likely only enforce this rule if one of the parties insists.
“All counseling sessions shall be confidential. The communications in counseling shall not be used in any manner in litigation nor relied upon by any expert appointed by the court or retained by any party.” 750 ILCS 5/607.6
I don’t see why a negotiation regarding the best interests of a child could not or should not take place within the confines of a counselor’s office. Or a counselor could merely be present during formal negotiations at one of the lawyer’s offices and the confidentiality of a “counseling session” would still apply.
Financial Settlement Offers And Confidentiality In An Illinois Divorce
The parties can agree to confidentiality between themselves regarding the financial aspects of the case. The agreement can be entered into independently or the agreement can be entered as an order with the court.
The parties can ask the court to insist on confidentiality of settlement offers through a protective order.
“Protective Orders. The court may at any time on its own initiative, or on motion of any party or witness, make a protective order as justice requires, denying, limiting, conditioning, or regulating discovery to prevent unreasonable annoyance, expense, embarrassment, disadvantage, or oppression.” Ill. S. Ct. R. 201(c)(1)
This Illinois Supreme Court Rule really governs discovery not settlement offers but the difference between discovery and a settlement offer (which essentially organizes the discovered information) is minimal.
An Illinois divorce judge is likely to order a protective order if the agreement furthers settlement.
Again, the presence of a counselor would likely trigger the confidentiality requirement. But, it would be harder to argue that the counselor was truly counseling when the only matters at issue were financial.
Some Aspects Of Settlement Offers In An Illinois Divorce Are Automatically Confidential
Illinois Supreme Court Rule 408 has a very specific rule about not using settlement offers as evidence. This rule really applies to civil cases, like personal injury, where fault or negligence is often admitted, explicitly or implicitly, through a settlement offer.
“Evidence of the following is not admissible on behalf of any party, when offered to prove liability for, invalidity of, or amount of a claim that was disputed as to validity or amount, or to impeach through a prior inconsistent statement or contradiction:
(1) furnishing or offering or promising to furnish or accepting or offering or promising to accept a valuable consideration in compromising or attempting to compromise the claim; and
(2) conduct or statements made in compromise negotiations regarding the claim.” Ill. S. Ct. R. 408
It’s hard to imagine evidence in an Illinois divorce that would be “offered to prove liability for, invalidity of, or amount of a claim that was disputed as to validity or amount”
Illinois is a no-fault state for divorce so there is no liability. Additionally, there are no “claims” in a divorce but merely valuations of marital property, child support and maintenance amounts (although such valuations could be argued to be “claims” for this purpose).
But, a settlement offer could certainly contradict later testimony in a divorce case. Bringing up evidence that contradicts other evidence is called impeachment.
For example, In re Marriage of Toole, 273 Ill. App. 3d 607, 619 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995) the court said, “[w]e agree with Michael that the statement in the settlement offer contradicts a material point of Patricia’s testimony regarding whether the $44,000 from Michael’s parents was a gift or a loan and, therefore, should have been admitted into evidence for impeachment purposes.”
But, Illinois Supreme Court Rule 408 doesn’t allow you to use settlement offers for impeachment purposes…unless that same evidence would have been found another way.
“This rule does not require the exclusion of any evidence otherwise discoverable merely because it is presented in the course of settlement negotiations.” Ill. S. Ct. R. 408
“This rule also does not require exclusion if the evidence is offered for purposes not prohibited by subdivision (a). Examples of permissible purposes include proving a witness’ bias or prejudice; negating an assertion of undue delay; establishing bad faith; and proving an effort to obstruct a criminal investigation or prosecution.” Ill. S. Ct. R. 408
So, if the evidence from the settlement negotiations could have been discovered through independent discovery...it’s still admissible. It’s hard to imagine any evidence in a divorce that couldn’t be discovered independently.
The rule goes on to state “[t]his rule also does not require exclusion if the evidence is offered for purposes not prohibited by subdivision (a). Examples of permissible purposes include proving a witness’ bias or prejudice; negating an assertion of undue delay; establishing bad faith; and proving an effort to obstruct a criminal investigation or prosecution.” Ill. S. Ct. R. 408
So, the few things that couldn’t be proven via independent discovery such as bias or prejudice, aren’t protected by this rule. This rule doesn’t protect much!
In sum, while it is in bad taste to bring up settlement negotiations to an Illinois divorce judge in pretrial or trial, the introduction of settlement negotiations as evidence in an Illinois divorce is probably allowed unless previously agreed to and memorialized via court order.
If you’re worried about negotiating the terms of your divorce so that your offer doesn’t hurt you in the future, schedule an appointment with my Chicago, Illinois family law firm to speak with an experienced Chicago divorce attorney.